Testing


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Wed Sep 02, 2009 at 04:15:10 AM EST

What is really left to say?

There are a lot of people in this city who have failed to get involved in this year's mayoral race despite the very serious and real consequences. Plenty of local elected officials. Can't seem to make up their minds.

This latest incident of the mayor covering up once again should be the final test.

Which side are you all on? Are you willing to let mayor jennings "move on" once again? Are you going to say that you don't have an opinion on this year's race? Or are you going to stand up and make your views known? Do we have any courageous individuals who will join Corey Ellis in standing up for what is right? Or will he stand alone with Barbara Smith and Dominick Calsolaro?

You've been able to sit it out and hope it wouldn't come to your doorstep. Hope you didn't have to be tested. Well, that didn't work out.

There is a very clear choice. Silence in times like these is support of the status quo. Silence is a vote for Jerry Jennings and all he represents. Speak up or climb into bed with Jerry. Your choice. I hear he doesn't like to share the covers.

Personally, I expect the majority of these "leaders" to remain silent. The status quo is very good to them. And they have a long list of excuses why they don't need to take a stand. The list is well worn. They use it often. Corey Ellis is challenging that status quo. They aren't happy about that. And now they have to take a stand. Do they keep quiet or do they do the right thing?

This test is over on September 15th. Make sure to show your work. All grades are final.

< Resignation Watch 2009 | Murder of the Week >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Related Links

+ Also by DIA
Display: Sort:
Testing | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden)
trying to help (none / 0) (#1)
by Mike the Friday Caller on Wed Sep 02, 2009 at 08:56:25 AM EST
I sent this out to everyone that has ever donated to any of my previous activist work.  Not sure how much the cash will help at this late date, but DIA is absolutely correct:  this race is critical to Albany.  Unreal that people still vote for the partying tan-man on the basis of his personna...  because god knows, there is no reason to vote for this guy on the merits (unless you are part of the patronage/corruption machine)...

Hey everyone...  Mike Stark here.  Some of you will remember me as a student.  Others will know me as the proprietor of an old blog of mine, CallingAllWingnuts. Still others will recall my work against George Allen, Virgil Goode and scores of other degenerate Republicans.  Hopefully most of you saw my most recent work exposing elected Republican birthers on Capitol Hill.

This is the first time I've sent an email of this sort, so please forgive any lack of sophistication.  Moreover, I'm writing about a race that will have very little meaning for many of you that receive this mail:  the contest for Mayor of Albany, NY.

Some background first...  Before I ever tapped out a single word on a blog, I looked at my immediate surroundings and saw that things could be so much better.  On December 31, 2003, David Scaringe was walking to his apartment near Lark Street, the epicenter of an eclectic and artsy Albany, NY neighborhood.  Several shots rang out; David was hit.  He died at the scene.  It turns out that all of the shots were fired by policemen in an attempt to capture a drunk driver who had driven off after being stopped.  Further investigation revealed that one of the two policeman involved had previously been suspended for suspected police brutality.

I was outraged.  David was 24 years old and he was killed, as I saw it, because two policemen wanted to be cowboys in a crowded neighborhood on New Year's Eve.  It was appalling.

That week and in the months that followed, I began keeping an eye on the Police Department.

One cop drove to his home drunk, backed into a gas line and burnt his apartment building down.  Two students at a nearby university, RPI, lost all of their possessions.  The cop walked away scot-free because...  well, the arresting officer failed to properly read the drunk his rights.

In another case, Yahoo! received a subpoena from a police department asking for records that would allow them to identify a department critic.  It was only after Yahoo! tendered the critical information that it was discovered that the police had forged the subpoena.

Perhaps most shocking of all, it was recently discovered that the police department had ordered military-grade machine guns that only law enforcement were allowed to purchase, and then sold the same guns into the black market.
Nobody has been prosecuted for any of these crimes.

I've barely begun to scratch the surface of corruption in Albany.  Without providing a full catalogue (encyclopedia set would be a more fitting descriptor) of the malfeasance, allow me to mention just a few more:

·         VIP parking system in which the Mayor's friends never had to pay parking tickets.

·         After the Mayor was personally involved in an accident on a weekend evening, the Police Chief was summoned.  The Mayor (a known late-night reveler) walked away without ever blowing into a breathalyzer.  

·         All sorts of favored property tax shenanigans, public works corruption and self-dealing contracts.

In the end, all of this is the Mayor's responsibility, in the truest sense of the word.  He's not only created this kind of culture, he's nurtured it.  He's a key participant.

I wouldn't be bothering you with any of this - after all, corrupt Mayors are a dime a dozen - if it weren't for two things.

The first is the fate of the innocent folks that don't share in the plundering of the city.  Most Mayors will know enough to spread some of their ill-gotten loot around and pay off the disenfranchised.  Jerry Jennings - Albany's mayor - is too stupid or too callous to follow the standard model.  Instead what we find are certain parts of Albany plagued by gang violence, diminishing neighborhood cohesiveness and, overall, rapidly increasing rates of despair.  Mothers are losing their children to violence, prisons or both.

The second reason I'm writing is that for the first time in as long as I can remember, Albany has a chance to change things.  Corey Ellis is a leader that has emerged from one of the underserved wards.  He got started in Albany politics by defeating one of the Mayor's hand-picked city-councilmen; since then, Corey's not looked back.  At every step Ellis has challenged the status-quo and now, he's poised to make history.  He's cleared the field of primary challengers and stands alone in opposition to Jerry Jennings.

He's got a legitimate shot at winning this race.
But he does need some help.

He needs to raise some money.  That's why I'm writing to you.

Many thousands of people - you are probably one of them - have PayPal'd me donations to sustain or reward my work as an activist through the years.  I've kept a list, but never used it.  
Until now.

I'm asking you to reach out and send $5, $10, $20, $100 or $1000 to the Ellis campaign.  Please donate here.

Look...  The banking crisis, the health care fight, the struggle to end the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan...  all of these things demonstrate how infernally difficult it is to change the direction of our country by way of Washington DC.  In national politics, $50,000 in contributions may not even be noticed.  But in a city of 100,000 people, $50,000 can change lives.

Please help me get Corey Ellis elected.

Sincerely,
Mike Stark

Hey Mike (none / 0) (#2)
by one flew east on Wed Sep 02, 2009 at 03:26:11 PM EST
Did the people of Charlottesville, Virginia finally get rid of you?  

And just to let the readers of this blog know, some of the information you posted is false or misleading.  Hey, but they shouldn't surprise anyone, we're all use to DIA.  Just a thought, but why don't you try and get all of your facts straight before you beg for money.  

Flewy, you are astounding. (none / 0) (#3)
by Jim Travers on Wed Sep 02, 2009 at 07:59:11 PM EST
Not a word from you about the chief's resignation, yet you manage to skewer Mike, or at least make a feeble attempt to.

"And just to let the readers of this blog know, some of the information you posted is false or misleading."

Like what Flewy? Please be specific.

You from time to time pop in with your 2 cents worth of opinion, but rarely do you substantiate your comments, so please do. We're all waiting to here from you just what it is that Mike's gotten wrong or has been misleading about.

flewy (none / 0) (#4)
by DIA on Thu Sep 03, 2009 at 03:53:46 AM EST
missed opportunity, bro.

You could've totally defended the racist police chief by saying he gave a hero's funeral to the crooked black cop Wilcox. Even though the chief knew wilcox was a criminal who was under FBI investigation, who drank on the job and who stole from the taxpayers by going home to sleep while collecting a pay check (but...but..they do it in schenectady). You could've gone on to say how it is unthinkable for a law enforcement official to praise a criminal but Tuffey did it out of his love of the black community.  

Think, friendo. When trying to push an immoral and corrupt agenda, you need to be smarter.

DIA (none / 0) (#6)
by one flew east on Thu Sep 03, 2009 at 04:25:30 PM EST
I will repeat this for about the tenth time.  I have never supported to criticized Jennings or Tuffey.  Why?  Because I could care less about them.  If they choose, they can defend themselves. My beef with you and others, has always been about the due process of law.  Something you've shown, that you know nothing about.

So DIA, when trying to push an immoral and corrupt agenda, you need to be smarter.

[ Parent ]

"to" (none / 0) (#7)
by one flew east on Thu Sep 03, 2009 at 05:01:05 PM EST
suppose to be "or"

[ Parent ]
knowing nothing (none / 0) (#9)
by DIA on Sun Sep 06, 2009 at 05:43:30 AM EST
flewy

if the people responsible for upholding the law refuse to do so, then your whole due process argument is a moot point.

However, you don't seem to care about that.

Which is why it is quite clear that you are nothing more than a shill for a system that you benefit from. Anyone who cared about a fair and functioning legal system in albany would be attacking Tuffey and Jennings first and foremost.



I notice you had no comment on spargo either. I figured a legal beagle like you would be all up in arms about a corrupt judge.  



As I've said before, you and I both know the truth.

cheers

[ Parent ]

Wrong again, DIA (none / 0) (#10)
by one flew east on Sun Sep 06, 2009 at 07:41:05 AM EST
Your statement, "if the people responsible for upholding the law refuse to do so, then your whole due process argument is a moot point".  Really, I bet the hundreds of people arrested daily in Albany will be happy to hear that.  So now I guess that you're stating that the police aren't doing their jobs?  Or is it, that the people who you think should be arrested, aren't getting arrested?   Which is it?

I've said this before and I'll say it again.  I will meet you in person at any time, any place of your choosing.  Just name it.  And yes, we both know the truth.  You're a complete fraud!

 

[ Parent ]

Let me count the ways.......Jim (none / 0) (#5)
by one flew east on Thu Sep 03, 2009 at 04:09:50 PM EST
Mike Stark posted a thread about raising money to help Corey Ellis get elected.  That by itself, I have no problem with.  In his post, Mike implies that the mayor and members of the Albany Police Department are corrupt and suggests that Corey Ellis would change things and do a better job than the current mayor.  Again, that's all fair game.  

However, some of the examples he listed are not factually correct.  

One of his examples, "One cop drove to his home drunk, backed into a gas line and burnt his apartment building down.  Two students at a nearby university, RPI, lost all of their possessions.  The cop walked away scot-free because...  well, the arresting officer failed to properly read the drunk his rights".  That officer was arrested and prosecuted for that incident, far from walking away "scot-free."  Misleading?  Let the readers be the judge.  

Next, Mike states, "In another case, Yahoo! received a subpoena from a police department asking for records that would allow them to identify a department critic.  It was only after Yahoo! tendered the critical information that it was discovered that the police had forged the subpoena".  Now in the context of Mike's entire posting, it appears that he is implying that members of the Albany Police Department were involved in this incident.  What he failed to inform the readers, is that this incident occurred in a different jurisdiction, not involving members of the Albany Police Department.  

You may ask, what's the point?  My point is that the Mayor of Albany has absolutely no authority over any other police department except the Albany Police Department. So why would Mike submit that information in the context of his posting?  I suggest, to mislead and misinform the readers.

His statement, "the police forged the subpoena" is a falsehood.  In New York State, there are basically 3 types of subpoenas.  First, a ad testificandum subpoena requires that a person come to court to testify as a witness.  Next, a duces tecum  subpoena requires documents, writings, papers, etc. be brought to court.  And finally, a information subpoena requires that information be provided to a person requesting it.  In the case Mike is talking about, the police department issued the wrong type of subpoena, far from forging the subpoena.  A complete distortion of the truth?  You decide.

About the Scaringe case.  Yes, it is true that one of the police officers had been previously been suspended for suspected police brutality.  What he fails to tell you is that officer was arrested and prosecuted for that incident and was acquited by a jury of his peers.  The City even attempted to terminate that officer, but refrained from doing so when they learned that an Arbitrator was going to rule in the officer's favor.  Omitting the facts to misinform?  Readers.

And Mike isn't the only one who can't get their facts straight.  Just today in a Times Union editorial, "Chief Tuffey's abrupt goodbye".

The statement, "Underlying the specific problems is a perception that the department is, not unlike other police forces, we're sure, an insular operation in which change comes grudgingly and chiefs are careful not to rock the boat too much. Chiefs who, under Mr. Jennings, have all come from within the department.

The mayor is right to say he will use a national search to replace Mr. Tuffey. While there is much to be said for institutional knowledge and for sending the message to the rank and file that they can aspire to one day lead the force, there are clearly problems here that the five insiders who have led the department over the last 14 years have been unable to fix".

The truth is, not all 5 chiefs, "have come from within the department".  Kevin Tuffey was appointed chief in 1996, prior to that appointed, he was never a member of the Albany Police Department.  Keep up the good work, TU!

Fair enough, and thank you, Flewy. (none / 0) (#8)
by Jim Travers on Sat Sep 05, 2009 at 12:16:46 AM EST
I don't know enough about the Albany cop who caused the Troy fire to determine the truth of the matter, so I cannot comment about that incident except to say that this too, was beyond the mayor's jurisdiction and whether you or Mike are right, he didn't lose his job.

It is my understanding that the Peace Officer's code of conduct, their oath to keep and obey the laws, extends into their personal time, off the job.

But perhaps Mike has not purposely mislead anyone, but rather simply gotten some facts wrong.

Either way, the department, I'm sure you'll admit, needs capable leadership and some bad cops need to go, especially the one involved in the Scaringe incident. One bad apple may not spoil the bunch, but repeated offenses committed by police officers who see little or no penalty sure shakes the public trust.

And I suppose that's my beef with you. You miss the point, Flewy. It's not about due process or even a finding of guilt and properly applied punishment. It is about conduct and public perception. If they were upholding the law, they would not ever find themselves written about in the papers or being brought before a judge, especially if they're cops. It's the repeated abhorent behavior of some you choose to be silent about when you could at least say, "if it's so, it's intolerable."

Some facts wrong (none / 0) (#11)
by one flew east on Sun Sep 06, 2009 at 07:57:33 AM EST
Jim, Just a point, but if you were Corey Ellis would you want someone asking for campaign contributions based on "wrong facts" about your opponents record.  If the answer is yes, what does that say about your character.  Mike misled and misrepresented facts to the readers that were not true.  

And I live in a glass house, apparently DIA and you don't.  And many of those police officers have been punished, you just don't like their punishments.

[ Parent ]

punishment (none / 0) (#12)
by DIA on Sun Sep 06, 2009 at 11:10:38 AM EST
Some people have been punished. The guy who showed up to work high and had cocaine in his system got fired.  Can't argue that.

However, I don't consider paid leave punishment. In the real world we call that vacation. It typically is viewed very favorably by the employee.  

It's the law (none / 0) (#13)
by one flew east on Sun Sep 06, 2009 at 04:23:27 PM EST
The New York State Civil Service Law allows a police officer to be paid after being suspended for 30 days.  What's ironic is that liberal democrats have passed these laws so that they would have Union support.  So if you want to complain to someone, just look in the mirror.  

And now I see how you think, any punishment must include termination.  

[ Parent ]

Testing | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search