Your Fabulous Dancing Mayor


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Sun May 04, 2008 at 05:37:26 AM EST

It is sad, really. How pathetic your representatives are. You might want to spend some time in the mirror. I have a mirror quiz for you.

Queztion 1: "Am I that fucking stupid? Really?!"

From a post earlier this year:

Mayor Jennings in November 2007 when he was looking to borrow a bunch more of your future tax dollars.

“I put a responsible budget together with the least amount of impact on the taxpayers in the city.”

Mayor Jennings in January 2008 now that the budget he created will be the one we use.

We will face significant financial pressures in the near future unless new sources of revenue are identified and existing revenue streams such as from our landfill remain constant.


So, the budget he gave us is "responsible" and yet sets us up for "significant financial pressures in the near future". Got it?

If Albany chooses to let someone like this continue to run our city, we deserve what we get (hint: higher taxes and fees, fewer services).
And now for today's headline.
"We budgeted an $8 million deficit for this year," he said.
Well, it was really $9 or $10 million but Jerry was just a hall monitor before becoming Mayor, not a math teacher. Remember when the mayor's bitch, Jim Sano, head of the "budget committee" gave his approval to this budget? Seems like so long ago. Or not.
"Don't look for the budget committee to solve your woes and do your work," said Sano, who voted for the plan. "I think we did due diligence."
Yeah. Due diligence. Keeping Jennings cock warm in your mouth.

It would seem that your friendly local blogger is one of the few who has been trading in reality these past years. Aside from councilman Calsolaro. You might remember what he said last year.
The Mayor’s proposed 2008 budget is a BAD budget. It already has a $10 million hole in it ($8 million borrowed from the fund balance and $1.7 million from the IDA) going into the 2009 fiscal year. Plus, with the Mayor’s history of overspending the budget between $3 million and $5 million just about every year he’s been in office, the city’s potential structural deficit for 2009 could be as much as $15 million! Now, throw in the city employees’ COLA for 2009, rising health insurance costs, and the city’s retirement fund contribution, and a $20 million HOLE in 2009 is not out of the question. If taxes alone were the only way to close this deficit, the tax rate could increase by 30%! This is what we are looking at a year down the road. This is what the fiscal mismanagement of the Jennings’ administration is leading us to. The Council can only do so much – if we defeat the proposed budget, it goes into effect anyway, but at least we sent a message to the Mayor. It will take strong leadership and the willingness to say NO to any budget increase in 2009 by both the Council and the Mayor working together to solve this fiscal nightmare.

In 2009, I am willing to go on record right now with this proposal, the city must implement at a minimum a 10% across-the-board cut in its proposed budget if we are to begin the process of returning to fiscal stability. I say 2009 because 2008 is already a lost opportunity, and it isn’t even here yet.


My critics (the mayor's mouth boys) call me a communist. They say I'm "far left". Meanwhile, I'm a fiscal conservative. Hey, wingnuts, want to join me on the RIGHT? What is that, I can't hear you? Got something in your mouth?

< Pesky Bloggers | FAQ Update >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
Display: Sort:
Your Fabulous Dancing Mayor | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)
So another Jennings proposal that's too little... (none / 0) (#1)
by Jim Travers on Sun May 04, 2008 at 01:31:48 PM EST
too late.

Five years too late when it was proposed six months ago. Not surprising, though.

Apparently just another mayoral soothsaying conveniently composed for the moment, never meant to be anything more material than the breath of hot air it was spoken with.

Blah, blah, blah, [I got my raise, again],
"consider ways to deal with these challenges for future budgets."

Yeah, Jerry. We believed you back in November, too. Honestly we did, yer onerious one!

And it's nice to see a council person like Mr. Conte recognizes that while he and others have been writing and reading the map that Albany's been following down the wrong road, all the while ignoring Mr. Calsolaro's pleas to note their erroneous oversite will lead them over a cliff, a real dead-end for the city - that it might be a good idea to sit down with the mayor and some peers to take a good look at the map they've written and to try to figure a new and safer route that doesn't lead to disaster.

"I'm more than ready to sit down in a cooperative way and work together," he said. "We're probably at the point where we need to do that. It's probably late."

Damn! That's Leadership!

Sure hope there's room enough to correct course before the road's end. Good thing we have a Mayor and Council working for us on that Mayor Jerry D. Jennings Temporary Committee Seeking Solvency.

Oh, that's right, we don't.

Lame Duck (none / 0) (#2)
by professor on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:43:28 PM EST
is what Jerry Jennings is...lets look at he landscape.  He is not, never, ever, going to be able to fix the problems that this city is facing.  In true Jennings spirit, he will leave the crap to the next guy to fix and will ride off into the sunset with a great pension and some $150-200,000 job.  It's a shame.

what? (none / 0) (#3)
by DIA on Sun May 04, 2008 at 06:56:00 PM EST

where are the tax borrow and spend Democrats who support the Mayor?   Nothing to say?   Huh?    But...but...but....he said it was a renaissance...that is good, right?

A renaissance, eh? (none / 0) (#4)
by Jim Travers on Sun May 04, 2008 at 09:29:19 PM EST
So I guess we're about to experience the Black Death period, huh?

[ Parent ]
Quick stop me from spending my, I mean your, Money (none / 0) (#5)
by tmonjeau on Mon May 05, 2008 at 09:21:41 AM EST
  I got a kick out of the headline, in that it made is seem like the Mayor was telling others that they had to rein in spending.  The fact of the matter is, he has to rein in his own spending, he dug this deep hole all by his lonesome, and he is the only one with the authority to get out.

  What is sad is that at the public comment period at the Common Council meeting about the budget, there were exactly two (2) people, including myself who told the common council that this budget was a mess and they had to "rein in spending"  The only question or response from the CC was Mike O'Brien pointed out that we also used some of our county surplus to balance our budget.  This was (is) true, but we also did a number of other things, eliminated vacant positions, restructured depts., went to a self insured health insurance and raised some taxes.  It does not take a rocket scientist, fiscal policy expert or accountant, to recognize and deal with reality.  The Mayor and his folks are unwilling to do so.

  But, hey, at least there was some comment from the CC, which was more than any of them who voted in favor of rezoning Holland Ave. did before blindly voting  to give us a beautiful Walgreens with a nice 25 foot high sign and drive through...

  And now I wonder exactly what "due diligence" Jim Sano was referring to.  How does it feel to get sold down the river by the Mayor Jim, I daresay just like I did when you voted for Walgreens...

Your Fabulous Dancing Mayor | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search