Dem debate, post 1: 21st CD


By albany layman, Section Diaries
Posted on Wed May 14, 2008 at 10:17:09 PM EST

The eight Democratic contenders for the nomination for the Congressional seat in the 21st district debated Wednesday night at the SEIU building on Washington Avenue.  The room was crowded, with the eight candidates themselves, with staffers and supporters, and presumably with other dorks like myself who wanted to see the candidates in person.

This being a Democratic debate, there were many areas of agreement on policies and issues.  But there were also enough differences, either on policy or on presentation and focus, that the whole thing was very interesting.  With this post, I hope to present a little bit of each candidate's biographical information and what each one identified as his or her priority for legislation.  I plan on putting up additional posts, in order to present more information on the candidates' policies and how they responded to questions.

I'm not a professional, so please forgive any deficiencies in note taking, paraphrasing, and attention sp... what was I saying?  

Here we go.

Aretakis introduced himself as not a professional politician.  His priority is protecting children.  He would like to see comprehensive legal rights for abused children, saying that they have no voice in DC, that punishments for abuse are not severe enough, and that there should be national standards for protecting children.

Brooks referenced the Gingrich and Bush era, and how they motivated her to be involved in politics.  In her introduction, she said that we needed to end the war, and re-invest that money here at home.  In response to the question about her priority for legislation, she talked about gas prices, about rolling back subsidies to oil companies, and working on energy technologies, including technologies for improving gas mileage in cars.

Burridge discussed his work history, which you can see here, and said that his legislative priority was universal healthcare.  He talked about beginning by covering all children, and by doing so, introducing adults into the process of universal coverage.

Freeman made a point of his upbringing in the city of Albany, and how he was the only candidate born and raised in Albany.  He talked about increasing funding for the inner city areas.  He also discussed as his legislative priority a proposal for an "age of maturity," in which a person is considered an adult in various ways at the age of 20.  This is part of his desire to protect children.

Shahinfar stated his campaign theme of "renewing America's promise."  He discussed being the son of an Iranian immigrant, whose take on America was that of freedom, hope, and opportunity.  He stated as his priority "HR 676," which is a House bill to establish universal healthcare.

Steck stated that while others talk about change, he has led on change in his position as Albany County legislator.  He pointed to his role in overturning control of the Colonie government from Republican to Democratic.  He stated that his legislative priority was the immediate withdrawal from Iraq, and that other initiatives were meaningless and subordinate to the cost of the war in Iraq.

Tonko stated his belief in a system that responds to the people, and that he speaks forcefully on behalf of working families.  His priority is to end our involvement in Iraq, and said that we cannot afford to dis-invest in healthcare and energy initiatives by investing money in the war.

Welser introduced himself as a non-politician and a realtor.  He pointed to a lack of proposals by the other candidates, and to a number of his own proposals.  His priority is an education bill, which would include mandatory high school education and either a military draft for drop-outs, or a military type school for them, in addition to a proposal for "remedial Saturdays" at schools.

Additional post(s) to follow, to present more of the candidates' thoughts and policies.

< Shorter Fred LeBrun | Hon. Dominic Calsolaro's website >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
Display: Sort:
Dem debate, post 1: 21st CD | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
The TU (none / 0) (#1)
by albany layman on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:47:05 AM EST
coverage is here.

Pre-debate coverage by Soundpolitic is here.  

Thanks Layman! (none / 0) (#3)
by Soundpolitic on Fri May 16, 2008 at 06:49:43 AM EST
Great to see somebody else covering the debate.  Thanks for the pre-debate link.  Not to steal your thunder, but it's good comparison: I've got my post-debate complete coverage up at The Albany Project.  It's good to get mutliple perspectives and even better than multiple bloggers are making up for the simplistic mainstream media coverage.  Great job!

[ Parent ]
The debate was excellent, (none / 0) (#2)
by devtob 53 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:16:56 PM EST
dealing with most major issues in a serious, even-handed way.

And it should have winnowed the field for anyone there, even before we learn who has the organizational skills and popular support to get the necessary petition signatures next month.

Aretakis, Freeman and Welser are out of their league, for various reasons obvious to any who heard them last night.

Burridge was quite impressive, but does not seem to have any real support or base.

Brooks, Shahinfar, Steck and Tonko all performed well, and I would be content with any of them as my next representative in Congress.

But I still like Steck.

Aside from his progressive stands on the issues, Steck also talked about his unique experience as a county legislator and chairman of the Colonie Democratic Committee, which had a very good year in 2007.

And if, as Publius1 commented at No. 2, he rubbed the Jennings/Commisso gang the wrong way, that's no negative for me and many Democrats, in Albany or the rest of the district -- it's a sign that he is not a get-along-go-along type committed to the status quo.

And we desperately need people like that in Washington.
The Democrats are the party of the people.

If all stay in the race until primary day, (none / 0) (#4)
by hawkny on Sat May 17, 2008 at 06:46:31 AM EST
the winner only needs to garner 30-35% of the vote total to be the Congressional nominee.

Few people will remember the issues by the time they enter to booths to vote. Placement on the ballot will be a factor. Weather too.

Name recognition alone makes Tonko the favorite but, at 60, he is kind of old to be elected to a post dependent upon seniority in Congress for power.

If Obama is the nominee for the presidency,  race and the youth vote will be issue as far as vote totals are concerned.  He has raised interest in voting, this year, in the minority community and people under 30. This may play well for Freeman, the only Black in the race.  Its hard to gauge this in a primary however.

Whomever the Democratic nominee is he/she will be the new Congressman in the 21st.

The GOP in New York and elsewhere is ripe for a pounding this year at all levels except in states like Utah and Idaho. Duh!

Dem debate, post 1: 21st CD | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search