Interesting organization and the drug war, Albany connection


By Corruptany, Section Diaries
Posted on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 08:53:11 PM EST

I know allot of people here dislike David Soares. I have my reservations about him at times, but the one thing about him that interests me is his stance on the drug war.

This weekend, I came across a very interesting organization while doing research for a project I am doing for an economic class. I am looking at the social and economic cost of the drug war. I was doing an analysis on prohibition, decriminalization and legalization. I stuble across an organization called Leap, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. This is a group of ex police officers, prosecutors and judges who want drug policy reform now.

The one thing that stuck out about this organization was the Upstate New York connection. If you go to their website, www.leap.org you will find a video where a former drug warrior from Buffalo and the City of Syracuse's police auditor talk about he social and economic cost of the drug war. It also talk about David Soares and how he also feels that this war is causing more harm then good.

To sum it, the City of Syracuse reported that the bulk of their police resources go to the drug war. In the US alone we spend 9 billion dollars on this war, and what success do we see. Take for instance Albany, a city that over the past twenty years has become a hotbed of narcotic activity. We probably spend millions on enforcing drugs laws which eat away resources for healthcare, schools, and other things. I am also sure that our prisons are jam packed with non-violent drug offenders. Yet still, we see the same exact scenario play over and over again, and its getting worse not better.

The major goal of this organization is to incrementally work towards drug legalization. They want this because they note that the drug war is unconstitutional and also causes more of the problems it seeks to stop. Look at the economic motive involved here. Think back to the prohibition of Alcohol. This period caused an increase in gangs, violence and abuse of booze. We realized one day that we would never be able to stop the flow and usage of drugs, hence we decided to legalize it and instead regulate.

Is it to much to say that the same logic applies to the current drug war. Cities like Albany, Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse are in dire straits financially right now. I can bet much of this is due to the cost of enforcing the drug war. Imagine if we instead legalized drugs and sold them in government run stores and also invested in drug treatment.

Doing so would take the profit motive from selling drugs which in turn would reduce the illicit elements involved in it. We would see a reduction in gangs, we would see our prison population decrease and we would also be able to focus more resources to fighting other crime and have more money for things like schools.

One of the most interesting things about this policy proposal is the broad spectrum of support. Its the one area where the left and right seem to agree. On that note, what are others thoughts. Is my argument above plausible, could it possibly be a better solution. Also, what steps has David Soares taken for drug policy reform. I recall him stating we needed to change things, but to me it appears he has actually went against his word and increased the drug war in his recent steroids investigation.

< Demolish the Howe Library, Save Troy City Hall ! | This country is so fucked >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Related Links

+ Corruptany's Diary
Display: Sort:
Interesting organization and the drug war, Albany connection | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
Counter point (none / 0) (#1)
by alfrednewman on Tue Apr 29, 2008 at 04:46:26 PM EST
Corrupt:

Interesting.  I wonder if anyone has done research on exactly what the financial costs would be if drug like Crack, Meth and the rest were readily available.  Yes, the enforcement of "prohibition" is costly but just what would the economic costs be if they were legalized?

We witnessed the first generation of "crack babies" coming of age during the past few years.  Think there is a correlation been the these crack babies and the drastic rise in violence? How the drastic increase in the costs associated with special education in the inner cities?  Think that any of those additional cost can be contributed to mommy and daddy doing drugs?

I also have to wonder what the projected increase in the social service budgets would be.  With the stigma of being "illegal" gone there would certainly be a rise in the number of people using what are now prohibited drugs.  What percentage of the work force, and the taxes they generate, would be lost because the worker was no longer able to be productive?  What would the increase in Social Security Disability payments be because of the increase in the number of people who become "disabled" because of addiction?

And finally what would the projected cost INCREASES in the costs of policing and incarceration be if drugs were legalized?   In 1997  32.6% of all state prison inmates across the country were under the influence of drugs when they committed the crime they were serving time for.  26.8% of state inmates were under the influence when they committed murder, 29.4 % of those in the federal system for murder were high when they killed. 24% of those serving time for assault were high. 39% of Motor vehicle theft were reported under the influence. 21.5 percent of sexual assaults were done under the influence.   These percentages are ten years out of date.  Care to guess if the % of violent crimes committed while someone was under the influence has gone up or down?

Legalize drugs? We cant afford it.
"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"

According to the guy I talked to... (none / 0) (#2)
by Corruptany on Tue Apr 29, 2008 at 07:13:34 PM EST
I am not saying I support this plan totally, though I think that we could enforce maximum sentences to people who committ a crime under the influence. Take for instance marijuana, do you honestly think we should be spending millions of dollars enforcing this plant especially when we have no evidence of violence, overdose etc etc.

I talked to the guy who runs this organization and he said that their goal would be to incrementally work towards ending prohibition. They don't support selling drugs in CVS, but they would propose a state run store that prohibits the sale of these substances to minors and also regulates the amount people use. He also stressed investments in treatment.

We will never be able to get drugs off the street. We can't keep drugs out of prisons, if we can't do this, how will we keep them off the streets. Anyways, I invote you to look at their website, they seem better read on the subject then I do.

www.leap.org

[ Parent ]

make reefer mandatory (none / 0) (#3)
by Tom Paine on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:13:18 AM EST
Maybe if we want to reduce violent crime, we should make smoking reefer mandatory. Stoners are about the most nonviolent folks there are.

Now before you all go flaming me, yes, I am joking.

There's probably something to be said for making some of the milder drugs legal, with some sort of restrictions. I'm not sure about the more dangerous stuff though.

 

I like that new commercial (none / 0) (#4)
by jackknight on Fri May 02, 2008 at 02:42:24 AM EST
where the drug dealer is standing outside the pay phone, complaining there's no business because of the pharmaceutical industry.

Interesting organization and the drug war, Albany connection | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search