Thoughts on Investigations and Albany Reporting


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 05:06:50 AM EST

Recently we were treated to this bit in a story written by reporter Michele Morgan Bolton.
A City Court judge is being investigated by the state Commission on Judicial Conduct over allegations he twice intervened when police stopped his son, including once when the youth had marijuana and drug paraphernalia, according to sources with knowledge of the probe.
Now we know that this judge (Keefe) beat a traditional Albany machine candidate and he isn’t in favor with the establishment. So many consider this “leaking” of an investigation to a reporter to be politically motivated. And since I’ve found MM Bolton’s work to be quite biased against any non machine candidates, I would have to agree. After all, we know that the Albany Police aren't fond of leaking information to Times Union reporters, right? After all, the president of the police union threatened the Times Union in the past year and has since refused to talk to them. Of course, that was only about cases involving crimes within the APD.

Now in another recent story about an assistant DA who screwed up some procedural parts of a case we were treated to this bit of editorializing by MM Bolton.
Such a declaration could be the kiss of death for the case that Albany County District Attorney David Soares has counted as one of his most significant.
So, Bolton takes the fact that an assistant DA screwed up, places the blame on the DA, says that this case is one that the DA has "counted" as one of his most significant but offers not proof of this. Seems like she is really going over board on this one and just trying to make readers think that this is the "kiss of death" for David Soares. I consider that unprofessional and biased. Now, let's take a look at another investigation in Albany and see how that has been handled. Remember this case?
From in or about December 2003 through in or about December 2005, he conspired and agreed with another person to use interstate wire communications in execution of a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from mortgage lenders by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises. As part of this scheme, Dare's conspirator would and did locate borrowers to obtain mortgages for the purchase of various residential properties in and about the City of Albany. Thereafter, Dare would and did prepare loan applications for the borrowers, which applications sometimes falsely represented that the borrowers had access to capital, usually through a bank account. In these applications, Dare also would and did falsely state and inflate the income of borrowers who he did not believe would otherwise qualify for financing. As part of this scheme, Dare's conspirator would and did obtain cashier's checks in the names of borrowers as purported proof of their access to capital when, in truth and fact, this was not the borrowers' capital and the checks were retained after the closings by Dare's conspirator. Dare and his conspirator would utilize inflated property values in obtaining financing, in order that the borrowers could obtain the properties without putting money down, and Dare and his conspirator could profit from the additional proceeds from the fraudulently obtained mortgages.

In furtherance of the scheme set forth in Count Three, Dare submitted or caused to be submitted approximately thirty-one (31) Uniform Residential Loan Applications containing false information regarding the income and/or assets of the borrowers, by facsimile and/or electronic mail from within the State and Northern District of New York to lenders in other states, including approximately seventeen (17) fraudulent applications submitted to BNC Mortgage and approximately seven (7) fraudulent applications submitted to Freemont Investment and Loan, both located the State of California. During the same period, Dare's conspirator obtained and retained cashier's checks in the names of the borrowers as purported proof of their access to capital, in furtherance of the scheme as set forth above.
Sounds a little more serious than picking your kid up after he was pulled over for speeding or for having one of your employees screw up a case. Sounds like some pretty serious white collar crime. Perhaps you remember this?
Albany Police Chief James Tuffey, who took over the department in December, said he was not aware of the federal investigation. However, several departmental sources said it was known by certain police officials that the FBI investigation was unfolding.
What investigation would that be? Well, the feds were looking into who was Dare's partner in this rather elaborate white collar crime spree. And apparently he was on the APD. So, did I miss the Times Union article that says that this is a "black mark" on Tuffey's record, or perhaps Tuffey's boss, Mayor Jennings? That the feds were investigating a member of his force for white collar crime? Seems like that might be the "kiss of death" if you were a police chief, right? Or if you were the Mayor who had presided over this force for the last 14 years through various allegations of corruptions, serious DWI issues among your employees, etc. So where has the investigation been into who Dare's partner was. Dare stole several million dollars from tax payers. This isn't some kid with a bag of weed we are talking about. So, where is the investigative reporting? Where are the reporters writing lines like, "This is just another in a long string of incidents that cast a dark shadow over Mayor Jennings adminstration and raise serious questions of ongoing corruption and disregard for the law..."? I'm not excusing the actions of the judge or the ADA. I am accusing the Times Union reporters of rather blatant bias. Perhaps this was all taken care of with another internal investigation by the chief and there was no need to release the information to the public?

Dare was originally scheduled to be sentenced on March 6th. Anyone hear about that? Because I don't recall seeing that in the paper.

< Albany's Comprehensive Plan | Keybank Changes Tactics >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
Display: Sort:
Thoughts on Investigations and Albany Reporting | 14 comments (14 topical, 0 hidden)
Daddddddyyyyyyy- Ethics committee line two (none / 0) (#1)
by alfrednewman on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 07:32:22 AM EST
Well, with all this crime going on I guess its OK for Keefe to unethically.

Is that what you are telling us?

I find it interesting that you are more angry about the leak then about the underlying act.  Lets see what the news article should have said:

"_________________________________ __________________________________ ________________"

That's right. Nothing.  If the kid had simply gotten a ticket nothing ever would have been in the press.  Because a story about a stupid kid acting like a stupid kid isn't worth the price of the ink.

But a story about a judge father interfering certainly is.  We deserve better than this.  

You should be mad at Keefe for providing the material for the story. Not the writer of the story.
"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"

wrong again al (none / 0) (#2)
by DIA on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 07:42:52 AM EST
I'm more than happy to see the stories about the ADA and the judge in the paper.  I would prefer Bolton's editors took out her editorial bits and just stuck to the facts, but obviously that isn't going to happen.  

what i would like to see if some front page stories on how a member of the APD was involved in a serious white collar crime spree.  

What i would like to see is the mayor being held to the same standards as his critics.  

Or do you not care about the fact that your are paying the salary of cops so that they can commit crimes?   You think your taxes are too high.  Do you know what the biggest line item on the city budget is when it comes to expenses?

Biggest budget line item (none / 0) (#4)
by alfrednewman on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 08:45:01 AM EST
I do believe its paying for all those cops standing around those dark isolated parking lots on Broadway for the next month or so.

I was very unhappy to see that they didnt fund the Alfred Newman Shill line item like I was hoping.  I needed the money to pay for my damn tax increase. And I ain't going to shill for free.

(Looking through the proposed school budget I do believe I found the line item for Champion shill though. I think thats unfair that he gets paid to shill and I dont.)

The Times Union would be violating their own long standing practice of biased reporting if they changed their writing style and we both know it.

The TU is the only game in town. They determine what they want to print. If they were really biased against Soares all they would have to do is report everytime the DA's office droped the ball on prosecuting someone ripping us tax payers off. But they don't do they?
"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"
[ Parent ]

investigations (none / 0) (#3)
by kateb on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 08:22:02 AM EST
in Albany are all political in some way, and that's a terrible injustice to crime victims.

I don't think the non-machine candidates are blameless.  DA Soares is the most political office holder I have had contact with.  D'Alessandro is the one who told me to tape the APD.  That office's response to me changed drastically when I truthfully  described problems with it.  Crime victims advocates suggested meeting with Soares, but so far he is snubbing their request!

APD prematurely (and retroactively) tried to say this investigation was closed, even as Tremblay was calling corroborating witnesses and had not done promised things.   Only reason seems to be the criminal leak, but it also would stop the pictures from getting out.  I have proof of mistakes and apparent lies;  offered it to Tuffey.

And all of this for a small-time case.

At the same time there are all the shenanigans, mistakes, and time consuming corrections here, I've accomplished a tremendous amount in my own work with others.  Finished my last major case on Monday, and still waiting for the right thing to be done on this pipsqueak case that people play politics with.

As for reporters, my gut says MMB is smitten with her access to players and leaks.  I hope she gets used to it.  I know from personal experience that police sources are usually wrong more than they are right.  Reporters have to be aware it's tricky.

As for D'Alessandro telling me to tape the APD, he was right.  But I only said it here because I had already let it slip after the fiasco he created at a recent meeting.

It's crazy, this endless journey with law enforcement and constantly cleaning up mistakes.  

FYI, open or closed doesn't really matter to me, once they properly finish it, because I just call 911 when/if the next thing happens.

I'll explain it all better when it really closes.

Republican Talking Points - Keefe's Son (none / 0) (#5)
by RodneyDem on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 11:57:25 AM EST
DIA, why don't you post this diary from one year ago?

From the diaries on your own site, courtesy of nitevision...

http://www.democracyinalbany.com/story/2006/4/4/74414/17747

First, write it off as hearsay.  You did that.  Then it gets exposed.  Next, point out illegal things someone else has done.  You're doing that.  Then it gets investigated.  Blame the media.  You're doing that too.  

Start thinking ahead.  What will your talking point be when the State Commission on Judicial Conduct finds that this is true?

nitevision (none / 0) (#6)
by kateb on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 12:41:36 PM EST

I've had a lot to say about nitevision recently.

Watch your sources.

They could put you in jail.

[ Parent ]

Lets do the time warp again... (none / 0) (#7)
by alfrednewman on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 12:57:34 PM EST
Judge's Son Skates | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden) | Post A Comment

And if this isnt true? )
by alfrednewman on Tue Apr 4th, 2006 at 04:47:18 PM EST
alfrednewman

Nitevision,
Is this anything more than hearsay? I have a problem with stories like this. A rumor that is confirmed by the refusal of the paper to write it?

If the kid had drugs then he should be in jail. For a LONG time and his father should be shamed into resigning.

So now there is proof that some of it occured and the paper printed the story. Little more than hearsay now.

Here is the 64,000 dollar question THAT NO ONE DARES TO ASK.....

Soares is supposed to investigate official misconduct.  Judge Keefe reportedly took criminal evidence away from the scene.

Will Soares now start an investigation into the reported conduct of Keefe?  We all know the answer here don't we.

Keefe founded the JFK Democrats where Soares just gave his mid term speach.  

Albany- where everyone knows everyone.

See no evil. Hear no eveil. Investigate no evil (that makes us look anything like the mayor).
"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"
[ Parent ]

rodney (none / 0) (#8)
by DIA on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 01:13:19 PM EST
rodney.  yeah, i'm defending the judge.  right.  Just like i'm defending the ADA who i said should be fired, right?   I also said the judge's kid should've gone to jail if that is what the law would normally require.  This piece isn't about the judge.  Its about the bias of the Times Union.  

here's a question for you Rodney?  Do you think we deserve to hear about the cop involved in the mortgage fraud or are you ok with the silence on that issue?  

If the state board finds it to be true i'll tell you what my response will be.  Its the same thing I say about the DA and his people.  And anyone who opposes the people you support.  Don't fuck up.  don't let your kids fuck up.  Don't let anyone you know fuck up.  We have to be better than the people who are running this city because they get a free pass on everything and we don't.  They will cheat.  They will break the laws. And until we get new people in office, they will get away with it.  The police chiefs will lie.  The mayor will lie.  His appointees will steal your tax dollars. That is how it is. And they will get away with it.  Common council members will make promises and in full view of everyone they will break them because their word is useless.  So, i will say, if you aren't up to the task of being better than them and not fucking up, then don't run for office.  If you do fuck up, take full responsibility.  Don't be a spineless fuck and call the chief when you crash your car and have him cover for you.  Be better.   If you promise you will do something, if you give your word, do it.  

We have to be better.  That is what i will say, Rodney.  We have to set a better example for our kids and theirs.   And we take responsibility for our actions.  We don't cheat to win elections.  WE have to be better.  

Is that getting through to you, Rodney?  We have to be real democrats.  

Do you want me to start listing all the things i've heard about the mayor that are hearsay?  how about the other judges in town?  Want to hear the story of the blind drunk judge driving away from a fundraiser?   We can play those games, Rodney.  I choose to be better.

the 64,000 dollar question THAT NO ONE DARES to (none / 0) (#9)
by DIA on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 01:32:01 PM EST
Did you intentionally use Mr. Dare's name in this?  Clever.   Am i the only person in Albany interested in hearing about his co conspirator?  Sure seems that way.  

I'm all for applying the law.   Anyone know what the law is in this case?  I'm daring to ask.  I'm assuming there really isn't anything to bring him on on any serious charges on but i'm not a lawyer.  The serious bit would appear to be the state investigation and whether he used his position to influence the outcome.  

And while we are asking questions, it would seem that the law enforcement officers at the scene would also be guilty of something, right?    But i guess that will be handled by an internal investigation by the chief so we can be assured that will be taken care of.

I didn't follow it (none / 0) (#10)
by kateb on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 01:39:25 PM EST

closely, but the only name I heard put out there as an alleged co-conspirator is deceased.

[ Parent ]
Not intentional but (none / 0) (#11)
by alfrednewman on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 03:24:51 PM EST
it seems to fit, doesn't it.

It is interesting talking to people who did work for both Wilcox/ Dare.  Wilcox check's would generally clear.

So here is the question:  

A lot of people know what has been going around town over the years.

Why doesn't anything happen?

Because if someone one does it will be war.
"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"
[ Parent ]

well (none / 0) (#12)
by DIA on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 04:04:41 PM EST
perhaps its time for a war, then.   They seem to be all the rage these days, anyway.   And its time for a change.  

And aside from that one incident with the underage hooker and the crystal meth, I'm clean as a whistle.

Told You So (none / 0) (#13)
by nitevision on Thu Apr 12, 2007 at 07:16:54 AM EST
I am not gloating over the story.  I would not submit any story without confirmation by several sources.

These people don't realize that their attempted cover up make both situations worse.  I initially defended judge Keefe as being a distraught parent. It is shocking now to read that a judge actually removed evidence (drugs) from the scene.  Judge Keefe foolishly placed himself right in the middle of this mess. The problem is compounded by the police who allowed this to happen.  Why did it take a whole year to make the mainstream press?  A full year and now all participants are surprised.  Guess they don't read DIA.  More likely, they do read here but won't admit it.

Where? (none / 0) (#14)
by Polly Ticks on Thu Apr 12, 2007 at 05:22:37 PM EST
Just where has it been confirmed that he removed drugs from the scene? MMB's stellar reporting indicates that "He also is alleged to have left with some evidence." We are dealing in allegations here. Can we hold off on the judgement until we have some facts?


[ Parent ]
Thoughts on Investigations and Albany Reporting | 14 comments (14 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search