Calsolaro on the Budget


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 09:57:23 AM EST

More of what we've come to expect from Councilman Calsolaro.
The Council doesn’t have much say on the budget. According to the Charter, the Mayor sets salaries and personnel costs make up over 70% of the budget. During the Common Council’s discussions of the budget, I proposed that the Council eliminate 50 of the approximately 72 unfilled positions being funded in the budget. This would save a million or two dollars. The proposal has not been accepted by the full Council as of today.

I also requested that the Council look into the cost of operating the municipal golf course – which has run at a deficit the past couple of years. The Mayor publicly condemned me on his radio show last Friday for suggesting that the fees at the golf course actually cover operating expenses. I have asked for a breakdown of users of the golf course: residents, non-residents, and private groups. To date I have not received this information. I have asked for an accounting of the contract the city has with the operator of the restaurant/clubhouse at the golf course – how much money does the city realize from this contract – I have not been given this information. I questioned how is it possible for the Council to do its due diligence on the budget when simple requests for information have been ignored.

I recommended that we hire an outside company to collect the over $2 million in outstanding parking fines. This proposal, a proposal I make every year, was again rejected out-of-hand despite a state comptroller’s report from about 5 or so years ago taking the city to task for failing to collect the outstanding parking fines.

I have proposed that the capital budget (borrowing) be at a level that is 5% less than the previous year’s amount (and we need to do this each and every year following this year) so that we can begin the process of lessening our burgeoning debt load. This proposal has not been acted on either.

I asked if it was possible to work with the unions and re-open contract talks in light of the City’s fiscal woes, but this suggestion fell on deaf ears.

Council Member Ellis suggested that if we just enforced our city code, and fined violators, we could bring in enough money to fund a program to eliminate the vacant building problem in Albany. Council Member Conti wants the one-time shot of funds from the IDA, about $1.7 million in 2008 to be used for the vacant building problem. The Mayor is proposing to use this one-time influx of money for operating expenses – leaving us with another hole to fill in 2009 when these funds won’t be available.

Please note, the following comments of mine are conjecture based on spotty information. The figures I present are “guestimates” at best and may not be close to the real thing, but due to a lack of information from the executive department, I can only speculate on the city’s fiscal outlook in the years to come.

The Mayor’s proposed 2008 budget is a BAD budget. It already has a $10 million hole in it ($8 million borrowed from the fund balance and $1.7 million from the IDA) going into the 2009 fiscal year. Plus, with the Mayor’s history of overspending the budget between $3 million and $5 million just about every year he’s been in office, the city’s potential structural deficit for 2009 could be as much as $15 million! Now, throw in the city employees’ COLA for 2009, rising health insurance costs, and the city’s retirement fund contribution, and a $20 million HOLE in 2009 is not out of the question. If taxes alone were the only way to close this deficit, the tax rate could increase by 30%! This is what we are looking at a year down the road. This is what the fiscal mismanagement of the Jennings’ administration is leading us to. The Council can only do so much – if we defeat the proposed budget, it goes into effect anyway, but at least we sent a message to the Mayor. It will take strong leadership and the willingness to say NO to any budget increase in 2009 by both the Council and the Mayor working together to solve this fiscal nightmare.

In 2009, I am willing to go on record right now with this proposal, the city must implement at a minimum a 10% across-the-board cut in its proposed budget if we are to begin the process of returning to fiscal stability. I say 2009 because 2008 is already a lost opportunity, and it isn’t even here yet.

Dominick Calsolaro

Common Council Member – First Ward
Read it and weep. This is why we need a new mayor and treasurer and should replace most of the common council members. There is no way to stop this downward spiral if Jennings remains in office.

< Priorities | Jamario Moon >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Related Links

+ Also by DIA
Display: Sort:
Calsolaro on the Budget | 11 comments (11 topical, 0 hidden)
Can someone who knows explain (none / 0) (#1)
by kateb on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 10:17:19 AM EST
why this is true:

"This is what the fiscal mismanagement of the Jennings' administration is leading us to. The Council can only do so much - if we defeat the proposed budget, it goes into effect anyway...."

I'm not asking for wise cracks, not asking for speculating, not asking for the web based crazy talk.

Can someone tell me -- log in for the first time if you have to, it's easy unless the site is acting up -- and just explain how it came to be -- how it came to be -- that the Council has NO SAY and the budget goes through anyway.

I knew this before, and Calsolaro confirmed it.  It goes through anyway, and the public meetings (and the council meetings) are a sham.

Someone tell me -- accurately -- how it came to be.

And then let's hold our next mayor accountable for changing it.

I want a mayor, not a king.

Council and the Budget (none / 0) (#2)
by caracappa on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 11:13:30 AM EST
Dominick's statement is effectively true, without being 100% accurate.

According to Section 603 of the City Charter, the Council must either approve the budget, or approve an amended budget (with certain limitations, such as expenses required by law, debt service, etc.).  If they don't approve or amend, the budget goes into effect.

But the Mayor has veto power over any amendment, and it takes a 2/3 majority to override.

So it takes 10 votes to change something in the budget that the Mayor doesn't agree with.

And that doesn't count what the Mayor can do through the Board of Estimate and Apportionment after the budget has been adopted.

[ Parent ]

thank you (none / 0) (#3)
by kateb on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 11:19:42 AM EST

What does this mean?

"And that doesn't count what the Mayor can do through the Board of Estimate and Apportionment after the budget has been adopted."

That Board is a mystery, which seems out of place in a democracy.

What's that process, with the mayor and that board, after the process you described?

I just want to understand what we have.

[ Parent ]

Scary bad budget (none / 0) (#4)
by tmonjeau on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 01:40:17 PM EST
Dominick hit many of the issues right on the head, but the overall malady is one of inertia and a refusal to look at each and every program and appropriation with a sharp pencil and a mission.
  The Mayor's budget's major underlying assumption is that NYS will always come up with $$ to bail us out.  This is obviously not a prudent assumption. I said this also in my comments at the CC public hearing on the budget (one of very few who bothered to comment by the way...) It is absolutely necessary now, as Dom set out at length, for the City/Mayor to sharpen the pencils and find as many places to start whittling away at spending, because with practically no surplus left, the old budgetary Sword of Damocles will be ready to fall in the next year or two.  
   As for the budget process, unfortunately for the City, the CC does not have a supermajority that would override a Mayoral veto (hahaha), and therefore has nothing to threaten the Mayor's budgetary decisions with.  Luckily for us on the County Leg, we have a supermajority and are able to negotiate with our County Executive,both sides from a position of relative strength.  This leads both sides to develop reasonable and somewhat flexible positions, and coming to reasonable results that ultimately reflect the input of our 39 legislators and our districts as well as our County Executive.  
   As for the city budget, one need look no further than 72 vacant positions, a perfect place to save several million dollars every year, by perhaps paring away 50 or so, and not one is slated for deletion.  In addiiton to deleting some of these vacancies, the city should look very carefully before filling any new vacancies that arise.    I just cannot comprehend why this budget has not even made a token effort at contraction or cost cutting.
  I could go on as Dominick did, but what is the point, the Mayors budget will be implemented, our hole will get deeper and deeper, and the big ol' property and school tax increase, I mean re-assessment, that I just got will get worse...  I pity whoever decides to follow our current Mayor. At least, just like Pattison in Troy and Stratton in Schenectady, she can rightfully direct the blame (but not the cost and pain) to her predecessor.
 

Oh does Congress look good (none / 0) (#5)
by dunleamark on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 05:02:59 PM EST
This is certainly a tradition in the Capital District.

Long time politician builds up huge structural deficits throug smokes and mirrors since no has the power or inclination to challenge him. When he is just about to fall over the cliff, he jumps to another job - think Congress - and then his predecessor does the responsible thing, enacting a a major tax hike plus major cuts to deal with all the accumulated problems. Thus committing political suicide while everyone shakes their head and says boy, at least so and so knew how to play in the real world and balance a budget. Let's prepare the throne for the next King.

And if the Jennings wasn't selling garbage space in the landfill, the bottom line would be even worse. And the cost of closing the landfill and figuring out the next step will further inflate the budget crash.

I agree with Mark's view ... (none / 0) (#6)
by Jim Travers on Wed Nov 21, 2007 at 05:53:11 AM EST
that there's a bleak future ahead for most except for Hiz Onerous One who will certainly jump ship before it runs aground, provided he's got a place to jump to. Let's hope that place's not Congress.

This post's opening line says it all.... (none / 0) (#7)
by hawkny on Wed Nov 21, 2007 at 06:04:32 AM EST

Thus, until a group of "reform" candidates, sufficient in number to gain control of the mayor's office and the common council, comes into existance, and wins in a general election, nothing is going to change at city hall. Nothing.

Well dumb question but... (none / 0) (#8)
by Tom Paine on Wed Nov 21, 2007 at 08:47:24 AM EST
How do we make that happen? Yeah, I am a newcomer. How does one get started working towards this? At least in Poland they had Solidarity. ;)

[ Parent ]
Have to Run for Mayor (none / 0) (#9)
by dunleamark on Thu Nov 22, 2007 at 05:42:12 AM EST
Unfortunately, there is one and only one office that counts - the Mayor.

After the success of the Citizens Party in running several third party candidates in 1981 (particularly pulling 30% against Jerry Jennings in Pine Hills and getting 22% in a three way race against Tom Burch, who got only 54%), the insurgent Democrats / CA types were finall embolden enough to run challengers in the democratic primary in the next election year - in the same districts where the CIP had done well. Four candidates won and the machine was declared dead - the problem was that someone forget to tell the machine.

Ever since them the insurgent Democrat candidates have won almost all the elections they field (including citywide races like DA and City Council President), declare the machine beaten - but nothing changes. The Mayor makes almost all the important decision

Another problem is that much of the energy goes into running the campaign - which is fun and exciting - but then it all goes away right after election day (or on until the next election) and there is no sustained efforts on the issues afterwards. For instance, while I appreciate the positions of Corey and Dominic around issues like abandoned houses and the convention center, why aren't groups like WFP, CA and the Greens organizing more focused campaigns to mobilize residents. (And of course why are groups like ARISE and WFP focusing on community benefit agreements rather than stopping the convention center and diverting the funds into rebuilding Arbor Hill, West Hill, SOuth End, etc.)

The insurgents blew a key opportunity two years ago by not getting behind Alice Green for Mayor, who pulled a surprising 25% of the vote on a shoestring budget on the Green Party line.

After the most recent election, when the Greens nearly won an election, I was surprised when some mainstream Democratic Party officials argued with me that it is time for a united WFP / Green challenge to the old Democratic machine, ignoring throwing all your resources into the Democratic Primary and just going for the general election.

But in any case, one has to go for Mayor next time, with as many council races as possible. Anything else is just repeating what has been done for the last 25 years. Some victories on election night but the machine continues to roll over the city.

[ Parent ]

Similar problems in Guilderland (none / 0) (#10)
by wredlich on Sat Nov 24, 2007 at 07:46:57 AM EST
We are seeing the same things in Guilderland - a budget that is incomprehensible, no explanations, and questioners are attacked.

Hopefully things will improve for us. But problems like this are not unique to Albany. I guess I should be happy we joined the club. :-)

Guilderland bought a golf course (Western Turnpike) several years ago, with Albany being touted as the model of why we should buy it.
Albany Lawyer Warren Redlich Blog: Albany Lawyer Blog

I'm getting the sense (none / 0) (#11)
by kateb on Mon Nov 26, 2007 at 02:33:19 PM EST
politics is the same everywhere.

I watch people who freely attack the mayor and police chief being totally intolerant of people criticizing the DA even when it's nowhere near as intense.

[ Parent ]

Calsolaro on the Budget | 11 comments (11 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search