Jennings' Short Term Liquidity and Your Long Term Taxes


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:51:27 AM EST

I've been writing about Mayor Jennings' gross financial mismanagement of the city finances for two years now. Debt has skyrocketed during his time in office. The water department is jacking up rates because it is so poorly managed. And all along the mayor is saying he is "balancing budgets". What he is doing is mortgaging your future. Literally. Because he is either incapable of properly managing the city or he just could care less. He's made his money, made his friends and donors much richer and he will leave the mess to someone else. Today the Times Union chimes in on the latest financial mess. However, let's be clear: this is just one more in a long line of examples that the mayor is digging a deep financial hole for the city of Albany. When you listen to his excuses remember to ask one question: Who has been running the city with total control to make all decisions for the last 14 years?
Mayor Jennings says the city had little choice but to strike the deal: "If we don't have the $6 million a year that we get from Allied, I have to lay off workers. It would impact the city's budget dramatically. This was a short-term step to maintain liquidity."

But that's precisely what's wrong with this arrangement. It is a short-term step that allows the mayor to ignore a $6 million structural deficit that needs to be addressed sooner rather than later. Balancing the budget on landfill fees is a garbage solution.
Maybe we could lay off the mayor's driver? He's spokesman? Maybe treasurer betty barnette could no longer have a tax payer funded car? Perhaps ever sign in town doesn't need to say "Brought to you by Mayor Jennings". We could stop printing those. You know, I'm sure i could come up with $6 million in very reasonable budget cuts in no time. And how about we see how many workers would have to be layed off. When you thrown in all the benefits we pay our workers they probably cost us at least $75K a pop on average. That would be 80 workers. Back in Corning's day we use to have almost 80 janitors working on city hall alone. Anyone think there aren't 80 jobs we could cut in the city of albany? And remember one other thing in all this. Mayor Jennings has said the convention center will lose money. If it does (and it will) you will have to make up the loss with your tax dollars. It's time for a new mayor.

PS. You should check out De Rosier's cartoon today in the print edition. Its sums up Jerry's career in one simple image.

< Hevesi Report | Sweeney's Campaign in a Nutshell >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
Display: Sort:
Jennings' Short Term Liquidity and Your Long Term Taxes | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)
Perhaps now Albanians are beginning to see... (none / 0) (#1)
by Jim Travers on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 09:02:57 AM EST
... why Jennings is so afraid of losing control of his city's finances to a fiscal control board. If that were to happen, he'd lose his ability to make such sweetheart backroom deals.

By the way, hasn't anyone questioned the other sweetheart deal the mayor's been working on with his good friend, Pataki?

You know, the deal whereby Albany receives the next twenty or twenty-five years of PILOT from the state in a lump sum - now.

Could there be anyone we could trust less to do the right thing with all those millions of dollars at their disposal?

If he gets his hands on that money, which was structured to be paid over a long period of time for a very good reason, it'll surely be gone before Albany elects their next mayor.

Again and again Jerry's broken his promises and betrayed public trust.

We really won't know how much he's mortgaged Albany's future and their taxpayers with until it's revealed by some future administration.

Perhaps it is time for a fiscal control board to take over Albany's finances.
                                                                           

accounting 101 (none / 0) (#2)
by truthbetold on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 03:10:54 PM EST
I may have to crack open my intro to accounting book again after reading that the mayor's budget calls for a $12 million dollar expansion so the city can collect $6 million in garbage fees from Allied Waste Management.

Am I missing something?

what part isn't clear (none / 0) (#3)
by DIA on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 03:42:16 PM EST
you pay your buddies $12 million ($16 million when they go over budget) in a one time expense that you don't include in the budget and then you bring in your $6 million and tell everyone you aren't raising taxes.  

Your buddies get rich and you say you balanced the budget!

[ Parent ]

Jennings' Short Term Liquidity and Your Long Term Taxes | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search