Latest News

Landfill News


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 04:10:58 AM EST

Another lesson in supply and demand. Some people actually give a crap about the environment and thus there is less demand for a landfill that is ruining the Pine Bush. Luckily for Jerry and his boys, Allied Waste do not fall into this category.
Citing environmental concerns about the expansion of Albany's Rapp Road landfill into the Pine Bush, the town has tentatively negotiated to send its trash to the Colonie Town Landfill, Supervisor Kenneth Runion said Wednesday.

"It's an environmental decision," Runion said. "My feeling is that the town of Guilderland has always been committed to preserving the Pine Bush and that the current expansion is looking into going into Pine Bush land."
In other landfill news, if you are wondering how the Albany landfill filled up 6 years too soon but the city didn't get an extra 6 years worth of revenue (approximately $50 million), you might enjoy this article.
A former executive of a New York trash-hauling company has been sentenced to seven years in prison for a bribery scheme that helped him overbill a city by $1 million.

Federal Judge Stephen Robinson said Tuesday that Albert Tranquillo III will serve the seven years after his current 8 1/2-year stretch for racketeering is over. The judge also ordered Tranquillo (Tran-QUILL'-oh) to pay back the city of Mount Vernon.

The 31-year-old Tranquillo pleaded guilty in April to conspiracy and bribery. His company had a contract to remove debris from city property and he confessed that he padded his invoices after bribing Public Works supervisor James Castaldo.

Castaldo has admitted accepting the bribes and is serving five years.
Remember the Albany landfill filled up 6 years too early. If the mayor's numbers are to be believed about how much money the landfill makes, that is around $50-$75 million in revenue that we apparently don't have. If we had any sort of law enforcement or justice system in Albany you'd think someone would look into that. Luckily for the mayor, we don't. Keep paying those taxes!

(2 comments) Comments >>

Another Ellis Fundraiser


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 03:49:15 AM EST

The Ellis campaign is having another fundraiser on July 12th. I'm assuming those of you who take the time to read political blogs also sign up for campaign updates from the candidates on their websites so you probably already know this.

(7 comments) Comments >>

Ghost Reporting


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 03:41:05 AM EST

The Times Union on the council meeting last night. Read more ofthe antics at ACO.

Comments >>

Supply and Demand


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Wed Jul 01, 2009 at 04:32:10 AM EST

Coming hot on the heels of the report showing how the city treasurer is completely incompetent and unable to produce the most basic financial reporting, this is a real treat.
"It is somewhat of a supply-and-demand issue," Leistensnider added, acknowledging concerns that if the city were to raise tipping fees the private haulers and municipalities might take their business elsewhere.

All revenue from the landfill, Leistensnider noted, goes to the city.

Councilman James Sano, chairman of the council Finance Committee, said bonding has "always been the way it was planned," and he questioned what would happen if higher tipping fees drove customers away.

"Then how are you supposed to fund it?" he said.
(first off, you might notice this bit from your local reporter that seems like editorialization: "acknowledging concerns that if the city were to raise tipping fees the private haulers and municipalities might take their business elsewhere." Really. Who is concerned about that?)

Ah, Mr. Sano, our local financial guru. Mr. "we did our due diligence on this city budget" even though we didn't address the big old $20 million deficit. If nothing else, Mr. Sano does provide a valuable service. He is willing to go public with some of the most math challenged and financially illiterate statements ever which help us highlight these issues. And he gets help from Ruth Leistensnider (if that is her real name). And, of course, our math challenged and unquestioning media.

Let's do a little background first. This might help Sano and Leistensnider understand "supply and demand"
Last week, the mayor defended his agreement to cut Allied's tipping fee from $46 a ton to $38, a 17 percent reduction. The two-year pact came after the company - the nation's second-largest hauler - threatened to load its garbage onto trains bound for an Allied-owned megadump in South Carolina.

"Those guys held us hostage," the mayor said. "If we don't have the $6 million a year that we get from Allied, I have to lay off workers. It would impact the city's budget dramatically. This was a short-term step to maintain liquidity."

Jennings does not need Common Council approval to set dumping fees, or for any other city contract.

Allied dumping shot up after the price break, from 85,000 tons in 2004 to 140,000 tons last year, the equivalent of 11,000 garbage trucks.

The Times Union conducted a computerized analysis of a quarter-million dump bills dating to 2001.

With headquarters in Scottsdale, Ariz., and annual revenues of $14 billion, Allied operates dumps and transfer stations in 37 states. Garbage hauled to Albany by the company now accounts for almost half of the $13 million in fees earned annually by the city.

This year, Allied is on pace to dump 175,000 tons, which would account for more than half of all incoming garbage.

"It is like we are running the landfill for the benefit of Allied," said 2nd Ward Common Council member Dominick Calsolaro. "I am amazed this kind of deal was done more than a year ago, when they were out there yelling that we were running out of landfill space and it was an emergency, and we had to expand into the Pine Bush.

"Instead, we should be extending the life of the landfill by taking less garbage. That would be a benefit to the citizens of Albany, who wouldn't have to pay for a new landfill so soon."

Jennings' proposed budget includes $9 million to expand the landfill in 2008.

Neither Calsolaro nor 12th Ward Council member Michael O'Brien, chairman of the General Services Committee that oversees the dump, knew about the Allied deal before being informed of it by the Times Union.

In response to a question from O'Brien during a budget presentation to the council on Monday, General Services Commissioner Bill Bruce said the city was charging commercial haulers "in the $60s."

In a subsequent interview with the Times Union, Bruce said he included a line on the Allied rate in a spreadsheet about Rapp Road finances that he had provided to city lawmakers in June.

On Wednesday, the mayor backed his commissioner. "It's not my fault that they didn't read it after they asked for it," Jennings said with a shrug
Please read this slowly. You see how when you drop the rates to below market value people dump a whole lot more garbage in your landfill? You see how Allied responded when we gave them this below market deal? So, if, as the DEC recommends, we raise their tipping fees $10 a ton so that they pay for the dump expansion instead of the taxpayers of Albany, what would happen?

Sano? Sano? Sano? Ok, anyone else? Yeah, you in the back.......right. They would dump less garbage here. Just like they did before Mayor Jennings cut them a sweetheart deal in 2006. What would happen if we didn't run the Albany Landfill just to benefit Allied Waste? That is right. It wouldn't fill up 6 years ahead of schedule. Supply and demand. If you have something of value and you give it away for free. People want it. Too many people. And that causes problems.

I'll try to put this in terms the head of the Finance Committee can understand. Remember when Oprah gave away coupons on her website for Free Kentucky Fried Chicken?

So, the current Albany landfill has a lot of demand. We are like the Wal*Mart of landfills. Cheap prices and a great place to get rid of old people we don't want to deal with anymore (what? You don't drop off old relatives on hazardous waste days?). But unlike Wal*Mart, we don't have the space to hold all the garbage in the world. We have very limited space (this is called "supply"). Very limited supply, big demand. Anyone know how we could change the supply and demand relationship? You, the hippie in the back with the bad tattoos....that is right. We could be more like the local co-op instead of Wal*Mart. Charge ridiculously high prices and have a shitty parking lot to boot. Can anyone tell me who gets more customers, WalMart or the co-op?

So, this is definitely a supply and demand issue. Roughly 90% of the garbage at the Albany landfill comes from outside of Albany, about half comes from Allied Waste who is paying below market rates. This is because we are cheaper than a Grand Street hooker. We need to start thinking like a Fort Orange club "lady of the evening". Something Client #9 would be interested in.

Now back to Mr. Sano.
Councilman James Sano, chairman of the council Finance Committee, said bonding has "always been the way it was planned," and he questioned what would happen if higher tipping fees drove customers away.

"Then how are you supposed to fund it?" he said.
The DEC says that you need to charge $10 for every ton to pay for the expansion. Please read this slowly. If it takes 7 years to fill up the landfill and you charge $10 a ton or it takes 3 years to fill up the landfill and you charge $10 a ton and in both cases your tonnage is the same because the landfill's volume is a fixed constraint, which option creates more money?

Mr. Finance Committee Chair? Mr. Finance Committee Chair? Need some more time to "do the math"?

The answer is "neither". They bring in the same amount of money but one option gets you a lot more years of using the landfill, which is a good thing, right?


Enjoy paying those taxes.

(5 comments) Comments >>

Report Highlights


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 06:15:10 AM EST

From the report This is my favorite part that comes near the end. I've pulled some other fun facts as well.
The Treasurer cannot provide a report listing the value of parking fine tickets written per year, and the amount of fines collected, forgiven, reduced or dismissed and the amount remaining uncollected for each year for the year 2002 to date.
Remember she gets paid around $100,000 a year plus gets a free city car and she can't even provide the most basic level of reporting. Any wonder why your city is bankrupt?
Certain conclusions are certain. There were no controls in place over any part of this system. There were no criteria to determine which license plates were entered. The list was never reviewed to insure that the vehicle was still worthy of being in the system. There was no clear mandate as to who was authorized that plates be entered.
The Treasurer again maintained that she had no knowledge of the VIP list or that warning tickets were being issued to anyone on this list. It was later discovered that she had in fact received seven such tickets on her vehicle
There is also apparently no one in authority at either Traffic Safety Division or the Treasurer’s Office who knows whether or not the no fine tickets are transmitted in the report of tickets from Traffic Safety to the Treasurer. While the City Treasurer and PVB Director both testified that they have never received no fine tickets in the weekly or daily list of parking tickets, one wonders why these tickets would be removed from the report. It would seem to make sense that a paper ticket was issued in the first place to keep track of the no fine tickets. Otherwise, the PSO would just ignore the car and not issue a ticket as they did prior to the purchase of handhelds. Considering that a PSO could at any time write a no fine ticket for any reason, it would make sense that the Traffic Violation Bureau Chief would want to audit the list of no fine tickets randomly to check for abuse of the system

Treasurer Barnette herself received several no fine tickets, and yet she was never concerned with the amount of no tine tickets being written and the attendant loss of revenue to the city. It is implausible that these tickets were written, yet never received by the parties involved. It should have been incumbent upon her and her PVB Director to determine why these tickets were not
Treasurer Barnette stated that she has nothing to do with the selection of a new system even though an entire Bureau under her leadership is dependent on the type of new system selected.
The attitude and actions of the City Treasurer towards the Common Council and the lack of internal controls of that Office could easily instigate a second investigation by the Council. From the start, the Treasurer portrayed her office as a completely independent office separate and apart from this city government. She refused to give the Council even the most basic information that would generally be available to the public under the Freedom of Information Law. When she did comply, she used the diversionary tactic of providing documents and reports, but not those actually requested by the Council.

There also appears to be a discrepancy with her March 30 testimony where she stated she had never seen or known of no fine tickets, and the later revelation that she had received seven of such no fine tickets. It was also disturbing when revealed that PVB Director Van Apeldorn’s wife received seventy no fine tickets. This calls into questions their entire testimony that evening
Barnette doesn't think any of this is her responsibility. Can't provide reports on anything her office does. Thinks she doesn't have to answer to anyone.

Any questions?

(8 comments) Comments >>

The Ghost of Christmas Future


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 04:35:59 AM EST

When reading this article, remember that the city of Albany is $20 million in the red when it comes to next year's budget and it gets worse after that. How is the next Mayor going to have to deal with this issue? Take a look at some options.
EL MONTE – The city council will consider Tuesday whether to initiate Chapter 9 bankruptcy proceedings for El Monte if council members cannot immediately find a way to completely fix the city's $12 million budget deficit.

"If I don't have a balanced budget by the end of the evening, we have to initiate chapter 9 bankruptcy proceedings," said City Manager Jim Mussenden.

In order to get that balanced budget, the city's four employee unions will have to agree to cuts to their benefits or face further layoffs, on top of the 100 employees that were already laid off earlier this month, Mussenden said.

In creating that budget, city staff determined city expenses were $12 million short of revenues. To cut $10 million in spending, Mussenden laid off 100 employees and recommended other cutbacks, including the closure of one of the city's four fire stations.

To cut the remaining $2 million, Mussenden is asking city employees to defer pay raises, pay $200 a month for medical benefits and, for some, pay 5 percent of their PARS retirement costs.

If the employee unions do not agreed to these concessions, Mussenden will propose further layoffs and service cuts, he said. And if the city council does not accept those, he will ask the city council to begin bankruptcy proceedings.
Maybe if union members had to live within the city limits, things would be different.

The forecast calls for pain.

(2 comments) Comments >>

Ron Bailey - The Mayor's Candidate for the Third Ward


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 04:28:06 AM EST

In case you haven't been following the silliness about the stolen petitions in the third ward, go check out this post over at the TU. A commentor raises some questions about the validity of Mr. Bailey's claims. This is Mr. Bailey's response.
we have 28 committee people in the 3rd ward 24 are hard working democratic we were out on the first day 9 am to 9pm in shifts .

the broken car glass was heard around 2:30am we foundit at 8:30am ms feasther was out at11;30am saying that i drop out when it had not hit the media she said i lost my petitions,we the voters went out and got more petitions signed that is what the people of the 3rd ward did now thats the factsee the news on cbs6on saturday nite
That comment, written by a man who has been accusing other people of serious crimes with no evidence, is from the "mayor's candidate". This is the level of professionalism Jennings likes to have in the people who run the city.

Any questions?

(6 comments) Comments >>

Council Debating Tickets


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 04:21:37 AM EST

For the blow by blow, go to ACO.

Here is my favorite exchange of the night, from the TU.
At one point, Rosenzweig objected to a phrase that called the city's failure to buy a new computer system for writing tickets when it knew for years that its old one was about to become obsolete the "worst example of government bureaucracy and inefficiency."

Others were adamant the indictment remain.

"If you want to call it government bureaucracy, I won't object," Morris said, "but I think that's a kind description."

Councilman Joseph Igoe suggested the wording be changed to call it "the worst miscommunication" -- to which Councilman Corey Ellis replied: "That's what bureaucracy is, people don't talk to each other."
Well said. Point, Ellis. And for anyone who has ever dealt with the city on an issue that required one department to know what the other was doing, I'm sure you will agree one of the biggest inefficiencies in this city is that no one talks to each other. One department has no idea what the other is doing. And often, no idea what they are doing either.

Comments >>

Next 8 >>

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
create account | faq | search