Display: Sort:
Alfred, Obnoxio (none / 0) (#6)
by Roscoe on Thu Oct 11, 2007 at 11:35:55 AM EST
Hold yer horses, boyz. A reevaluation of the planning concepts currently in play is a bad thing? Allowing the market economy to work is a bad thing? Potentially changing the political dynamics of our fallen city is a bad thing? I would think rather that ANY open, transparent and positive move would be more likely to lure and stimulate investment than the current game. Of course it would have to be publicized, and for that we'd need a real newspaper, but you gotta start somewhere.  You talk like Jerry, mumbling about building subsidized infill on Alexander Street the minute the city responds to an unnecessary emergency at great expense, and another city block is finally laid waste by stupidity. Hey, condos full of greeny-geeks stylishly bicycling to work in designer hemp might not be all that bad! We could get them downtown on a trolley to drink and cross-pollinate, and they could wonder when they got there how anyone can live in the land of no-parking, the dazed (govmint workers), and the damned.

Display: Sort:

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
create account | faq | search